Which is more important for a college student,
暑假作文400字-大连东软信息技术职业学院
Which is more important for a college
student,
specialized knowledge or a wide
range of learning.
（正）: It is universally
acknowledged that our world is
developing
rapidly, and an unique skill for a person is
indispensible. With a well specialized
knowledge in a certain
field, there is an army
of graduates who have found a pleasant
job,
get promoted, or initiated one’s own career
successfully.
Among millions of undergraduates
who are now enjoying and
have so far benefited
tremendously from specialized university
studies, We are inclined to the notion that
the specialized
knowledge is far more
important than a wide range of learning.
（反）: First, I admit that your statement to the
issue is very
wonderful. Have you ever notice
the fact that obtaining all sorts
of knowledge
on a wide range of subjects guarantees one’s job
opportunity in such a competitive world, many
large
corporations prefer a person with a wide
range of knowledge.
The wider the range of
knowledge you have, the more angles
you can
receive to view the world , and surely the better
prospective you will have. So we’re convinced
that equipped
with a wide range
（正）: To your statement we just have to
disapprove. As we all
know, a decent salary
and a high-ranking position wouldn’t be
offered to one who were in lack of proficiency
on the subject
which requires extremely
specialized skills related to his job. In
a
specific field, only when we are enabled to have
specialized
knowledge can we achieve our
ultimate goals. For example,
doctors should be
professional if they want to make an
operation
successfully. The pilot should also know
explicitly
how to control the plane when a
safelanding is required.
（反）: In my
opinion, you just misunderstood our views. We
mean a wide range is much more important than
the
specialized one, and we haven’t denied the
significance of
specialized knowledge.
（正）: As you said, you haven’t denied the
importance of
specialized knowledge. We have
reasons to doubt whether
you have the
suspicion to support our opinions. Even if what
you said is true, first, how can you convince
us the fact that the
diverse works in the
world are divided into so many sorts,
instead
of one or two universal ones. And second, have you
ever heard the fact that Bill Gates
started his Microsoft relying
on a wide range
of knowledge without specialized knowledge
in
computer programming?
（反）: Surely, we
are stick close to our standpoint. What we
stressed on is the key words “more important”.
We maintained,
It is a noteworthy fact that a
high percentage of people are not
working in
their majors, which indicates that they devote
themselves to some field that they were not
specialized in.
Meanwhile, it is not very
likely for one to find a perfectly
suitable
work while beginning to search for jobs. If one
has
acquired diverse knowledge in university,
he can easily find a
position where he may
apply what he has learned.
（正）: Well, we
are firmly convinced that the fact is not as what
you’ve just confessed. Whether we can well
adapt to the world
is not depend on how wide
the range of knowledge you’ve
aquired is, but
the degree of the knowledge you’ve handled.
students who specialize in one field can be
more professional
than those who receive
comprehensive education when they
graduate and
those well-trained might be more
welcomed by
the society. So it’s “it’s better to master one
than
engage ten”.
（反）: We
thought we should debate according to the fact.
The
main reason why I put forward the idea is
that taking classes in
different subjects can
guarantee students absorbing basic
knowledge.
A good example in this point is Harvard
University,
which divides the courses into
seven areas, including foreign
cultures,
historical studies, literature and arts, moral
reasoning,
quantitative reasoning, science and
social analysis. Each
undergraduate must take
some classes in every area to get
credit. As
the most renowned university in the world,
Harvard,
through this means, ensures that each
student has certain
basic knowledge in an
aspect, which will be a powerful
strength
while competing with others. In this case, the
importance of a wide range of knowledge is
self-evident.
In summary, the question
,which one is better between these
two kinds
of knowlege,c an not be answered in a nutshell.
Defferent students like defferent patterns ,
and both of them
are indispensable to our
society.
Which is more important
for a college student,
specialized knowledge
or a wide range of learning.
（正）: It is
universally acknowledged that our world is
developing rapidly, and an unique skill for a
person is
indispensible. With a well
specialized knowledge in a certain
field,
there is an army of graduates who have found a
pleasant
job, get promoted, or initiated one’s
own career successfully.
Among millions of
undergraduates who are now enjoying and
have
so far benefited tremendously from specialized
university
studies, We are inclined to the
notion that the specialized
knowledge is far
more important than a wide range of learning.
（反）: First, I admit that your statement to the
issue is very
wonderful. Have you ever notice
the fact that obtaining all sorts
of knowledge
on a wide range of subjects guarantees one’s job
opportunity in such a competitive world, many
large
corporations prefer a person with a wide
range of knowledge.
The wider the range of
knowledge you have, the more angles
you can
receive to view the world , and surely the better
prospective you will have. So we’re convinced
that equipped
with a wide range
（正）: To your statement we just have to
disapprove. As we all
know, a decent salary
and a high-ranking position wouldn’t be
offered to one who were in lack of proficiency
on the subject
which requires extremely
specialized skills related to his job. In
a
specific field, only when we are enabled to have
specialized
knowledge can we achieve our
ultimate goals. For example,
doctors should be
professional if they want to make an
operation
successfully. The pilot should also know
explicitly
how to control the plane when a
safelanding is required.
（反）: In my
opinion, you just misunderstood our views. We
mean a wide range is much more important than
the
specialized one, and we haven’t denied the
significance of
specialized knowledge.
（正）: As you said, you haven’t denied the
importance of
specialized knowledge. We have
reasons to doubt whether
you have the
suspicion to support our opinions. Even if what
you said is true, first, how can you convince
us the fact that the
diverse works in the
world are divided into so many sorts,
instead
of one or two universal ones. And second, have you
ever heard the fact that Bill Gates
started his Microsoft relying
on a wide range
of knowledge without specialized knowledge
in
computer programming?
（反）: Surely, we
are stick close to our standpoint. What we
stressed on is the key words “more important”.
We maintained,
It is a noteworthy fact that a
high percentage of people are not
working in
their majors, which indicates that they devote
themselves to some field that they were not
specialized in.
Meanwhile, it is not very
likely for one to find a perfectly
suitable
work while beginning to search for jobs. If one
has
acquired diverse knowledge in university,
he can easily find a
position where he may
apply what he has learned.
（正）: Well, we
are firmly convinced that the fact is not as what
you’ve just confessed. Whether we can well
adapt to the world
is not depend on how wide
the range of knowledge you’ve
aquired is, but
the degree of the knowledge you’ve handled.
students who specialize in one field can be
more professional
than those who receive
comprehensive education when they
graduate and
those well-trained might be more
welcomed by
the society. So it’s “it’s better to master one
than
engage ten”.
（反）: We
thought we should debate according to the fact.
The
main reason why I put forward the idea is
that taking classes in
different subjects can
guarantee students absorbing basic
knowledge.
A good example in this point is Harvard
University,
which divides the courses into
seven areas, including foreign
cultures,
historical studies, literature and arts, moral
reasoning,
quantitative reasoning, science and
social analysis. Each
undergraduate must take
some classes in every area to get
credit. As
the most renowned university in the world,
Harvard,
through this means, ensures that each
student has certain
basic knowledge in an
aspect, which will be a powerful
strength
while competing with others. In this case, the
importance of a wide range of knowledge is
self-evident.
In summary, the question
,which one is better between these
two kinds
of knowlege,c an not be answered in a nutshell.
Defferent students like defferent patterns ,
and both of them
are indispensable to our
society.