读书报告的范文-预防青少年违法犯罪工作总结

十八世纪英国散文欣赏（一）
记得大学时，学过JOHNSON博士的名篇TO the Right Honorable
the Earl of Chesterfield , 近来偶然读到 Johnson 朋友James
Boswell(1740-1795)写的有关此篇的相关介绍。
Johnson and Lord Chesterfield
by James Boswell
Lord Chesterfield, to whom Johnson had paid the high compliment of
addressing to his Lordship the Plan of his Dictionary, had behaved to him
in such a manner as to excite his contempt（蔑视） and indignation（愤
怒）. The world has been for many years amused with a story confidently
told, and as confidently repeated with additional circumstances, that a
sudden disgust was taken by Johnson upon occasion of his having been
one day kept long in waiting in his Lordship‟s ante-chamber, for which
the reason assigned was that he had company with him; and that at last,
when the door opened, out walked Colley Cibber; and that Johnson was
so violently provoked when he went away in a passion and never would
return. I remember having mentioned this story to George Lord Lyttelton,
who told me he was very intimate with Lord Chesterfield; and holding it
as a well-known truth, defended Lord Chesterfield by saying that “Cibber,
who had been introduced familiarly by the back-stairs, had probably not
been there above ten minutes.” It may seem strange even to entertain a
doubt concerning a story so long and so widely current and thus

implicitly adopted, if not sanctioned, by the authority which I have
mentioned; but Johnson himself assured me that there was not the least
foundation for it. He told me that there never was any particular incident
which produced a quarrel between Lord Chesterfield and him; but that his
Lordship‟s continued neglect was the reason why he resolved to have no
connection with him. When the Dictionary was upon the eve of
publication, Lord Chesterfield, who it is said had flattered himself with
expectations that Johnson would dedicate the work to him, attempted, in a
courtly manner, to soothe and insinuate himself with the Sage, conscious,
as it should seem, of the cold indifference with which he had treated its
learned author; and further attempted to conciliate him by writing two
papers in the World, in recommendation of the work; and it must be
confessed that they contain some studied compliments, so finely turned
that if there had been no previous offence it is probable that Johnson
would have been highly delighted. Praise, in general, was pleasing to him;
but by praise from a man of rank and elegant accomplishments he was
peculiarly gratified….
参考译文：柴爵爷对琼生的编字典的计划不屑一顾，令其身感受
辱。 关于此事，社会上早有传闻，以讹传讹。琼生某日拜会柴爵爷，
在门房久等不见。后来，从里面出来刺伯 科。琼君早于其先至，而其
确先被接见。心中有怨，愤然离开柴府。终不踏其门庭半步。此事，
我记得问过李乔治爵爷，他与柴爵爷颇有交情。他替柴爵爷辩解道：

“刺伯科与柴爵爷宿 有来往，当日是从后门入府，且很快离府，约莫
半顿茶的功夫。”若非知情人士以告，我等对此事哪生得 半点疑心。
然琼生对余言道，李某之言不足为信；琼生与柴爵爷从未有过争执；
是柴爵爷的怠慢 使琼生决意不为门客为其驱使。字典即将付梓之时，
据说柴爵爷放言琼生会将此巨作题献于他，想到昔日 有负琼生，试图
弥补裂痕。并在世界报刊登两篇评论，试图与琼生复好。评论上可见
柴爵爷对词 典的推崇与褒奖之词。于是乎得出结论，柴爵爷若当初没
有凌辱琼生，为何琼生对如此褒奖之词不屑一顾 ，乃至有后来发表的
答复之词呢？
This courtly device failed of its effect. Johnson, who thought that “all
was false and hollow,” despised the honeyed words, and was even
indignant that Lord Chesterfield should for a moment imagine that he
could be the dupe of such an artifice. His expression to me concerning
Lord Chesterfield upon this occasion was, “Sir, after making great
professions, he had, for many years, taken no notice of me; but when my
dictionary was coming out, he fell a-scribbling in the world about it.
Upon which, I wrote him a letter expressed in civil terms, but such as
might show him that I did not mind what he said or wrote, and that I had
done with him.”
参考译文 ：爵爷的计策没有奏效。琼生认为那是假仁假义，不屑
其恭维之词。更愤慨其厚颜，妄图分享编撰词典的 功劳。琼生对余言
道：“君可知，昔时吾曾几番希望得到柴爵爷的支持，可多年来，吾

< br>备受其冷落。现词典即将问世，他竟然屈尊撰文
世界报
发表评论。为
此，吾致信 柴爵爷，虽言辞谦逊，但申明本人对其言论与评论无甚特
别关注，且与君之恩义早已断绝。”
This is that celebrated letter of which so much has been said, and
about which curiosity has been so long excited, without being gratified. I
for many years solicited Johnson to favour me with a copy of it, that so
excellent a composition might not be lost to posterity. He delayed from
time to time to give it me; till at last in 1781, when we were on a visit at
Mr. Dilly‟s, at Southhill in Bedfordshire, he was pleased to dictate it to
me from memory. He afterwards found among his papers a copy of it,
which he had dictated to Mr. Baretti, with its title and corrections in his
own handwriting. This he gave to Mr. Langton; adding that if it were to
come into print, he wished it to be from that copy. By Mr. Langton‟s
kindness, I am enabled to enrich my work with a perfect transcript of
what the world has so eagerly desired to see.
参考译文：关于这篇著名的（书信体）答复，谈论已经很多，一直以来被饶有兴趣地关注，可惜，原信一直没有公开。多年来，余一
直恳请琼生慨与信的复写本，以 流传后世。可他迟迟没有答复。终于
在1781年（译者注：信写于1754年2月7日），我们在拜佛 郡南山
的迪先生家做客时，他才欣然应允，凭着记忆口述信的内容。后来，
琼生从他留存的信件 中找到原信的复写本。他口授，巴莱缇先生执笔，
信的标题和修改出自琼生之手。这个复写本他给了朗唐 先生。琼生还

嘱咐，答复信的刊印本以朗唐先生手里的信做底本。蒙朗唐先生慨允
提供底本，使我能顺利完成琼生的重托，以飨世人――他们期盼的太
久了。
译后记：本文是 十八世纪英国散文，个别地方的语法，用法与今
有异。这里提供的很大可能是第一个中文译本，故译者诚 惶诚恐，深
怕以讹传讹。但本人学养有限，错误不可避免。欢迎大家批评指正，
共同进步。
感谢我的老师，让我萌发学英语的兴趣。

查斯特菲尔德
查斯特菲 尔德勋爵，英国著名政治家、外交家及文学家，曾
就读于剑桥大学，并游学欧洲大陆。1726年继承爵 位，1728年出
使荷兰，任驻荷兰大使，1745年任爱尔兰总督,1746~1748年身兼
国务大臣等职位,表现出了杰出的政治才干。他风流倜傥，是英国
讲究礼仪的典范，备受当地人民的爱 戴。以著作《致儿子的信》
文明于世。他与同时代的文学家波普、艾略特、爱迪生、斯威夫
特等 过往甚密。
有《教子书》(“letters to his son”)传世。名为<一生的
忠告>是查斯特菲尔德勋爵写给儿子的家书，其内容说理透彻，辞
藻华丽，在英国上流社会广为 流传,被誉为是译本绅士教育的教
科书并成为一本世界名著。

“所有的人都是平凡的，有些人因知道了这一点而成了非凡
的人。”就是出自他致儿子的信。

塞缪尔·约翰逊
人生经历
约翰逊于1747年开始了他最重要的一项工作——《英文字
典》（A Dictionary of the English Language）的编撰。 这一
工作直到1755年才完成。虽然它被广 泛的赞誉并且有着巨大的影
响，约翰逊并未从中获得很多经济利益。在编撰它的同时，他还
写了 一系列的双周刊散文称之为《漫步者》。这些散文，大多涉
及道德和宗教主题。它一直写到了1752年 。虽然当时并不流行，
结集出版后却获得了广泛的欢迎。
约翰逊于1758年开始了另一个系列的散文写作——“The
Idler”。在两年中，这个系列每 周出版在一个周刊上。他们比上
一个系列更短。在1759年，约翰逊出版了他的小说“雷塞拉斯”，< br>据说是为了支付她母亲葬礼的费用。同时，他获得了很高的名声，
诗人查尔斯 丘吉尔评论说：“He for subscribers baits his
hook - and takes your cash, but where's the book？”。（他
为读者准备需要的他的书， 和你的需要的现金，但是哪来的书？）
1762年，约翰逊获得了300镑每年的政府津贴。1763年他遇
到了他未来的传记作者詹姆斯-博 斯韦尔。大约同一时间，他组建

了“俱乐部”。现在，他已经是一个大人物了，并且在1 765年被
授予都柏林三一学院的名誉博士学位，十年后又获得了牛津的这
一学位。
1765年，他认识了议员亨利-塞雷尔夫妇。很快他们成为了
好朋友。后来约翰逊与他们 一起生活了15年直到亨利于1781年
去世。塞雷尔夫人的日记等为博斯韦尔的传记提供了很多素材。
1773年，他与博斯韦尔一起进行了“苏格兰西部群岛的旅
行”，两年后他出版了同名游 记.(博斯韦尔的于1786年以另一题
目出版)
约翰逊的最后一本重要著作是《诗人列传》（Lives of the
English Poets）是在伦敦书商的要求下写作的。在每一个人的诗
作前，都有一段传记和评论。
约翰逊于1784年去世，安葬于西敏司寺。
他身材高大，但视力和听力都不好且他脸上从小便有伤疤.
约翰逊的名声部分的归于博斯韦尔的 《约翰逊传》一书的成
功。但是因为他在约翰逊几乎成名后才遇到他，他的书中用了不
恰当大的 比例来描述约翰逊的最后几年。所以，人们很少知道约
翰逊于贫困作斗争的早期生活。
名言
最贫的是无才，最贱的是无志
Style in Samuel Johnson＇s Letter to Lord Chesterfield

Samuel Johnson (1709----1784) is a famous English essayist, literary
critic and dictionary compiler. In 1747, when Johnson began his
““Dietionary of the English Language““, Chesterfield had at first
indieated that he could be his patron, but when Johnson came to him for
conerete help, Chesterfield neglected him to the point of ignoring him.
Johnson was insulted and furious. In 1755, when Johnson„s Dictionary
was published and acclaimed after seven years of hard work, Chesterfield
openly recommended it, hoping to get some credit for it as Johnson„s
patron. Johnson at once wrote his famous letter in a sharp style, openly
denying Chesterfield„s patronage, and attacking him outright for his
behaviour. The attack, however, was made in a cireumloeutious way.
Letter to Lord Chesterfield by Samuel Johnson
My Lord,
I have been lately informed, by the proprietor of the World, that two
papers, in which my Dictionary is recommended to the public, were
written by your Lordship. To be customed to favours from the great, I
know not well how to receive, or in what terms to acknowledge.
When, upon some slight encouragement, I first visited your Lordship, I
was overpowered, like the rest of mankind, by the enchantment of your
address, and could not forbear to wish that I might boast myself Le
vainqueur du vainqueur de la terre, that I might obtain that regard for
which I saw the world contending; but I found my attendance so little

encouraged it. When I had once addressed your Lordship in public, I had
exhausted all the art of pleasing which a retired and uncourtly scholor can
possess. I had done all that I could; and no man is well pleased to have
his all neglected, be it ever so little.
Seven years, my Lord, have now past, since I waited in your outward
rooms, or was repulsed from your door, during which time I have been
pushing on my work through difficulites, of which it is useless to
complain, and bave brought it at last, to the verge of publication,
without one act of assistance, one word of encouragement, or one simile
of favour. Such treatment I did not expect, for I never had a Patron
before.
The shepherd in Virgil grew at last acquainted with Love, and found
him a native of the rocks.
Is not a Patron, my Lord, one who looks with unconcern on a man
struggling for life in the water, and, when he had reached ground,
encumbers him with help? The notice which you have been pleased to
take of my labours, had it been early, had been kind; but it has been
delayed till I am different, and cannot enjoy it; till I am solitary, and
cannot impart it; till I am known, and do not want it. I hope it is no very
cynical asperity, not to confess obligations where no benefit has been
received, or to be unwilling that the public should consider me as owing
that to a Patron, which Provindence has enabled me to do for my self.

Having carried on my work thus far with so little obligation to any
favourer of learning, I shall not be disappointed though I should
conclude it , if less be possible, with less, for I have been long wakend
from that dream of hope, in whichi I once boasted myself with so much
exultation, my Lord.
Your Lordship'd most humble,
most obedient servant,
Sam. Johnson.

十八世纪英国散文欣赏（一）
记得大学时，学过JOHNSON博士的名篇TO the Right Honorable
the Earl of Chesterfield , 近来偶然读到 Johnson 朋友James
Boswell(1740-1795)写的有关此篇的相关介绍。
Johnson and Lord Chesterfield
by James Boswell
Lord Chesterfield, to whom Johnson had paid the high compliment of
addressing to his Lordship the Plan of his Dictionary, had behaved to him
in such a manner as to excite his contempt（蔑视） and indignation（愤
怒）. The world has been for many years amused with a story confidently
told, and as confidently repeated with additional circumstances, that a
sudden disgust was taken by Johnson upon occasion of his having been
one day kept long in waiting in his Lordship‟s ante-chamber, for which
the reason assigned was that he had company with him; and that at last,
when the door opened, out walked Colley Cibber; and that Johnson was
so violently provoked when he went away in a passion and never would
return. I remember having mentioned this story to George Lord Lyttelton,
who told me he was very intimate with Lord Chesterfield; and holding it
as a well-known truth, defended Lord Chesterfield by saying that “Cibber,
who had been introduced familiarly by the back-stairs, had probably not
been there above ten minutes.” It may seem strange even to entertain a
doubt concerning a story so long and so widely current and thus

implicitly adopted, if not sanctioned, by the authority which I have
mentioned; but Johnson himself assured me that there was not the least
foundation for it. He told me that there never was any particular incident
which produced a quarrel between Lord Chesterfield and him; but that his
Lordship‟s continued neglect was the reason why he resolved to have no
connection with him. When the Dictionary was upon the eve of
publication, Lord Chesterfield, who it is said had flattered himself with
expectations that Johnson would dedicate the work to him, attempted, in a
courtly manner, to soothe and insinuate himself with the Sage, conscious,
as it should seem, of the cold indifference with which he had treated its
learned author; and further attempted to conciliate him by writing two
papers in the World, in recommendation of the work; and it must be
confessed that they contain some studied compliments, so finely turned
that if there had been no previous offence it is probable that Johnson
would have been highly delighted. Praise, in general, was pleasing to him;
but by praise from a man of rank and elegant accomplishments he was
peculiarly gratified….
参考译文：柴爵爷对琼生的编字典的计划不屑一顾，令其身感受
辱。 关于此事，社会上早有传闻，以讹传讹。琼生某日拜会柴爵爷，
在门房久等不见。后来，从里面出来刺伯 科。琼君早于其先至，而其
确先被接见。心中有怨，愤然离开柴府。终不踏其门庭半步。此事，
我记得问过李乔治爵爷，他与柴爵爷颇有交情。他替柴爵爷辩解道：

“刺伯科与柴爵爷宿 有来往，当日是从后门入府，且很快离府，约莫
半顿茶的功夫。”若非知情人士以告，我等对此事哪生得 半点疑心。
然琼生对余言道，李某之言不足为信；琼生与柴爵爷从未有过争执；
是柴爵爷的怠慢 使琼生决意不为门客为其驱使。字典即将付梓之时，
据说柴爵爷放言琼生会将此巨作题献于他，想到昔日 有负琼生，试图
弥补裂痕。并在世界报刊登两篇评论，试图与琼生复好。评论上可见
柴爵爷对词 典的推崇与褒奖之词。于是乎得出结论，柴爵爷若当初没
有凌辱琼生，为何琼生对如此褒奖之词不屑一顾 ，乃至有后来发表的
答复之词呢？
This courtly device failed of its effect. Johnson, who thought that “all
was false and hollow,” despised the honeyed words, and was even
indignant that Lord Chesterfield should for a moment imagine that he
could be the dupe of such an artifice. His expression to me concerning
Lord Chesterfield upon this occasion was, “Sir, after making great
professions, he had, for many years, taken no notice of me; but when my
dictionary was coming out, he fell a-scribbling in the world about it.
Upon which, I wrote him a letter expressed in civil terms, but such as
might show him that I did not mind what he said or wrote, and that I had
done with him.”
参考译文 ：爵爷的计策没有奏效。琼生认为那是假仁假义，不屑
其恭维之词。更愤慨其厚颜，妄图分享编撰词典的 功劳。琼生对余言
道：“君可知，昔时吾曾几番希望得到柴爵爷的支持，可多年来，吾

< br>备受其冷落。现词典即将问世，他竟然屈尊撰文
世界报
发表评论。为
此，吾致信 柴爵爷，虽言辞谦逊，但申明本人对其言论与评论无甚特
别关注，且与君之恩义早已断绝。”
This is that celebrated letter of which so much has been said, and
about which curiosity has been so long excited, without being gratified. I
for many years solicited Johnson to favour me with a copy of it, that so
excellent a composition might not be lost to posterity. He delayed from
time to time to give it me; till at last in 1781, when we were on a visit at
Mr. Dilly‟s, at Southhill in Bedfordshire, he was pleased to dictate it to
me from memory. He afterwards found among his papers a copy of it,
which he had dictated to Mr. Baretti, with its title and corrections in his
own handwriting. This he gave to Mr. Langton; adding that if it were to
come into print, he wished it to be from that copy. By Mr. Langton‟s
kindness, I am enabled to enrich my work with a perfect transcript of
what the world has so eagerly desired to see.
参考译文：关于这篇著名的（书信体）答复，谈论已经很多，一直以来被饶有兴趣地关注，可惜，原信一直没有公开。多年来，余一
直恳请琼生慨与信的复写本，以 流传后世。可他迟迟没有答复。终于
在1781年（译者注：信写于1754年2月7日），我们在拜佛 郡南山
的迪先生家做客时，他才欣然应允，凭着记忆口述信的内容。后来，
琼生从他留存的信件 中找到原信的复写本。他口授，巴莱缇先生执笔，
信的标题和修改出自琼生之手。这个复写本他给了朗唐 先生。琼生还

嘱咐，答复信的刊印本以朗唐先生手里的信做底本。蒙朗唐先生慨允
提供底本，使我能顺利完成琼生的重托，以飨世人――他们期盼的太
久了。
译后记：本文是 十八世纪英国散文，个别地方的语法，用法与今
有异。这里提供的很大可能是第一个中文译本，故译者诚 惶诚恐，深
怕以讹传讹。但本人学养有限，错误不可避免。欢迎大家批评指正，
共同进步。
感谢我的老师，让我萌发学英语的兴趣。

查斯特菲尔德
查斯特菲 尔德勋爵，英国著名政治家、外交家及文学家，曾
就读于剑桥大学，并游学欧洲大陆。1726年继承爵 位，1728年出
使荷兰，任驻荷兰大使，1745年任爱尔兰总督,1746~1748年身兼
国务大臣等职位,表现出了杰出的政治才干。他风流倜傥，是英国
讲究礼仪的典范，备受当地人民的爱 戴。以著作《致儿子的信》
文明于世。他与同时代的文学家波普、艾略特、爱迪生、斯威夫
特等 过往甚密。
有《教子书》(“letters to his son”)传世。名为<一生的
忠告>是查斯特菲尔德勋爵写给儿子的家书，其内容说理透彻，辞
藻华丽，在英国上流社会广为 流传,被誉为是译本绅士教育的教
科书并成为一本世界名著。

“所有的人都是平凡的，有些人因知道了这一点而成了非凡
的人。”就是出自他致儿子的信。

塞缪尔·约翰逊
人生经历
约翰逊于1747年开始了他最重要的一项工作——《英文字
典》（A Dictionary of the English Language）的编撰。 这一
工作直到1755年才完成。虽然它被广 泛的赞誉并且有着巨大的影
响，约翰逊并未从中获得很多经济利益。在编撰它的同时，他还
写了 一系列的双周刊散文称之为《漫步者》。这些散文，大多涉
及道德和宗教主题。它一直写到了1752年 。虽然当时并不流行，
结集出版后却获得了广泛的欢迎。
约翰逊于1758年开始了另一个系列的散文写作——“The
Idler”。在两年中，这个系列每 周出版在一个周刊上。他们比上
一个系列更短。在1759年，约翰逊出版了他的小说“雷塞拉斯”，< br>据说是为了支付她母亲葬礼的费用。同时，他获得了很高的名声，
诗人查尔斯 丘吉尔评论说：“He for subscribers baits his
hook - and takes your cash, but where's the book？”。（他
为读者准备需要的他的书， 和你的需要的现金，但是哪来的书？）
1762年，约翰逊获得了300镑每年的政府津贴。1763年他遇
到了他未来的传记作者詹姆斯-博 斯韦尔。大约同一时间，他组建

了“俱乐部”。现在，他已经是一个大人物了，并且在1 765年被
授予都柏林三一学院的名誉博士学位，十年后又获得了牛津的这
一学位。
1765年，他认识了议员亨利-塞雷尔夫妇。很快他们成为了
好朋友。后来约翰逊与他们 一起生活了15年直到亨利于1781年
去世。塞雷尔夫人的日记等为博斯韦尔的传记提供了很多素材。
1773年，他与博斯韦尔一起进行了“苏格兰西部群岛的旅
行”，两年后他出版了同名游 记.(博斯韦尔的于1786年以另一题
目出版)
约翰逊的最后一本重要著作是《诗人列传》（Lives of the
English Poets）是在伦敦书商的要求下写作的。在每一个人的诗
作前，都有一段传记和评论。
约翰逊于1784年去世，安葬于西敏司寺。
他身材高大，但视力和听力都不好且他脸上从小便有伤疤.
约翰逊的名声部分的归于博斯韦尔的 《约翰逊传》一书的成
功。但是因为他在约翰逊几乎成名后才遇到他，他的书中用了不
恰当大的 比例来描述约翰逊的最后几年。所以，人们很少知道约
翰逊于贫困作斗争的早期生活。
名言
最贫的是无才，最贱的是无志
Style in Samuel Johnson＇s Letter to Lord Chesterfield

Samuel Johnson (1709----1784) is a famous English essayist, literary
critic and dictionary compiler. In 1747, when Johnson began his
““Dietionary of the English Language““, Chesterfield had at first
indieated that he could be his patron, but when Johnson came to him for
conerete help, Chesterfield neglected him to the point of ignoring him.
Johnson was insulted and furious. In 1755, when Johnson„s Dictionary
was published and acclaimed after seven years of hard work, Chesterfield
openly recommended it, hoping to get some credit for it as Johnson„s
patron. Johnson at once wrote his famous letter in a sharp style, openly
denying Chesterfield„s patronage, and attacking him outright for his
behaviour. The attack, however, was made in a cireumloeutious way.
Letter to Lord Chesterfield by Samuel Johnson
My Lord,
I have been lately informed, by the proprietor of the World, that two
papers, in which my Dictionary is recommended to the public, were
written by your Lordship. To be customed to favours from the great, I
know not well how to receive, or in what terms to acknowledge.
When, upon some slight encouragement, I first visited your Lordship, I
was overpowered, like the rest of mankind, by the enchantment of your
address, and could not forbear to wish that I might boast myself Le
vainqueur du vainqueur de la terre, that I might obtain that regard for
which I saw the world contending; but I found my attendance so little

encouraged it. When I had once addressed your Lordship in public, I had
exhausted all the art of pleasing which a retired and uncourtly scholor can
possess. I had done all that I could; and no man is well pleased to have
his all neglected, be it ever so little.
Seven years, my Lord, have now past, since I waited in your outward
rooms, or was repulsed from your door, during which time I have been
pushing on my work through difficulites, of which it is useless to
complain, and bave brought it at last, to the verge of publication,
without one act of assistance, one word of encouragement, or one simile
of favour. Such treatment I did not expect, for I never had a Patron
before.
The shepherd in Virgil grew at last acquainted with Love, and found
him a native of the rocks.
Is not a Patron, my Lord, one who looks with unconcern on a man
struggling for life in the water, and, when he had reached ground,
encumbers him with help? The notice which you have been pleased to
take of my labours, had it been early, had been kind; but it has been
delayed till I am different, and cannot enjoy it; till I am solitary, and
cannot impart it; till I am known, and do not want it. I hope it is no very
cynical asperity, not to confess obligations where no benefit has been
received, or to be unwilling that the public should consider me as owing
that to a Patron, which Provindence has enabled me to do for my self.

Having carried on my work thus far with so little obligation to any
favourer of learning, I shall not be disappointed though I should
conclude it , if less be possible, with less, for I have been long wakend
from that dream of hope, in whichi I once boasted myself with so much
exultation, my Lord.
Your Lordship'd most humble,
most obedient servant,
Sam. Johnson.