Is gun play good or bad for children For many years阅读理解答案

余年寄山水
826次浏览
2020年08月15日 16:01
最佳经验
本文由作者推荐

抚顺一中-文明礼仪黑板报


Is gun play good or bad for children For
many years阅读理解答案

Is gun play good or bad for children For many years I
emphasized its harmlessness. When concerned parents
expressed doubt about letting their children have toy guns,
because they didn’t want to encourage them in the slightest
degree to become criminals, I would explain how little
connection there was. In the course of growing up, children have
a natural tendency to bring their aggressiveness more and more
under control if their parents encourage this. One- to
two-year-olds, when they are angry with another child, may bite
the child’s arm without hesitation. But by 3 or 4 they have
already learned that aggression is not right. However, they may
pretend to shoot their mother or father, but smiling to assure
them that the gun and the aggressive behaviour aren’t to be
taken seriously.
In the 6- to 12-year-old period, children will play an earnest
game of war, but it has lots of rules. There may be arguments,
but real fights are relatively rare. At this age children don’t
shoot at their mother or father, even in fun. It’s not that the


parents have turned stricter; the children’s own conscience has.
In adolescence aggressive feelings become much stronger, but
well brought-up children can turn them into athletics and other
competition or into kidding their friends.
In other words, I’d explain that playing at war is a natural
step in the disciplining of the aggression of young children; that
a cautious parent doesn’t really need to worry about producing a
criminal.
But nowadays I’d give parents much more encouragement
to guide their child away from violence. A number of incidents
have convinced me of the importance of this.
One of the first things that made me change my mind,
several years ago, was an observation that an experienced
nursery school teacher told me about. Her children were hitting
each other much more than previously, without reason. When
she talked to them, they would protest, “But that’s what the
Three Stooges do.” (This was a children’s TV program full of
violence which immediately became very popular.)
What further shocked me into reconsidering my view was
the assassination(暗杀)of the former President, and the fact that
some school children cheered about this. (I didn’t so much
blame the children as I blamed the kind of parents who will say


about a President they dislike, “I’d shoot him if I got the
chance!”)
These incidents made me think of other evidences that
Americans often tolerate lawlessness and violence. We were
hard on the Indians and the later waves of immigrants. At times
we denied justice to groups with different religions or political
views. And now a great percentage of our adult as well as our
child population has been endlessly fascinated with dramas of
Western violence and with cruel crime stories, in movies and on
television. This doesn’t necessarily mean that we Americans on
the average have more aggressiveness inside us than the people
of other nations. I think rather that the aggressiveness we have is
less controlled, from childhood on.
To me it seems very clear that in order to have a more
stable and civilized national life we must bring up the next
generation of Americans with a greater respect for law and for
other people’s rights than in the past. There are many ways in
which we could and should teach these attitudes. One simple
opportunity we could seize in the first half of childhood is to
show our disapproval of lawlessness and violence in television
programs and in children’s gun play.
I also believe that the survival of the world now depends on


a much greater awareness of the need to avoid war and to
actively seek peaceful agreements. There are enough nuclear
arms to completely destroy all civilization. This terrifying
situation demands a much greater stability and self-control on
the part of national leaders and citizens than they have ever
shown in the past. We owe it to our children to prepare them
deliberately for this awesome responsibility.
11. The underlined word “this” in Paragraph 1 refers
to______.
A. controlling their aggressiveness B. playing with toy
guns
C. aggressive behaviour D. the course of growing up
12. Based on the author’s view about the relationship
between children’s aggressiveness and their age, which of the
following is true
A. A 2-year old boy knows that it is not correct to behave
aggressively.
B. The older children become, the less aggressive they will
be.
C. 6- to 12-year-olds enjoy war games but develop them
into argument and serious fights.
D. Adolescents’ aggressiveness is often displayed in the


form of competition.
13. What conclusion does the author intend to draw from
the story told by the nursery school teacher
A. Watching violence can lower a child’s standard of
behaviour.
B. Violent TV programs should be banned in nursery
schools.
C. Children are generally lawless or violent nowadays.
D. It is acceptable to let children have toy guns.
14. What does Paragraph 7 mainly talk about
A. Examples showing that Americans are more aggressive
than other nations.
B. Evidences proving that America has a long history of
lawlessness and violence.
C. The idea that children are less able to put their
aggressiveness under control.
D. More reasons why the author changed his view on the
main issue of the article.
15. What is a must if people intend to enjoy stability and
civilized national life
A. To show disapproval of gun play in television programs.
B. To make people aware that there are already enough


nuclear arms.
C. To elect national leaders with greater stability and
self-control.
D. To bring up children who show more respect for the law
and others’ rights.
ABADD


江南style什么意思-介绍信抬头


2017中秋节-李汉荣散文


青海建筑职业技术学院-初中新学期计划


广西大学梧州分校-常州中考分数线


澳大利亚气候-鲁迅简介


江苏畜牧兽医学院-芜湖人事网


国际信用卡-好累的个性签名


国歌的诞生-年末工作总结